In their own words

[[DvT]UY]

Originally Posted by {DvT}JonahHex

[color=seagreen]So what is the solution? I presume that "they" want "us" dead can be perceived as a problem. How does one solve this problem?

Kill them before they do us. Simple.

It is well established that blood feuds are self-perpetuating. "They" killed "us" on 9/11. We killed them when we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. They responded with an "insurgency." We responded with a "surge."

We can just glass the area...problem solved.

Since I also presume that ending the cycle of violence is desirable, how do we stop it?

See answer above

Presumably they have what they consider good reasons for wanting to kill us - whether we consider the reasons good or not is immaterial

Exactly

...our perception of their reasons won't change their minds; if anything our perception of their reasons as being invalid only reinforces the validity in their minds.

Don't care

Conjuring hatred and fear of them only leaves one avenue open: kill 'em all before they kill us.

"He shoots!" "He scores!!!"

Are there other solutions?

That would be up to them but considering what I've seen so far...nah.

If not, then it must be realized and accepted that "all" does not mean "some" or "most." This has a name: genocide.

"Defensive" genocide in this case. /shrugs

[{DvT}JonahHex]

Originally Posted by Albert Einstein

"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones."

/me starts stockpiling sticks and stones.